Fundamental rights: shameful manoeuvring of the French socialists (and others)

Sharing cover

Update : The French S&D MEPs succeeded, to obtain the deletion of the 4th part. Shame on them. Further update after analysis of the votes. The governmental right wing parties (PPE and ECR) voted for the deletion of parts 2 and 4 as could be expected. The S&D (social-democrats) voted in most cases for keeping these parts and in particular part 4. Only 12 S&D MEPs voted to delete part 4, among which 10 French socialists. The deletion was obtained with a majority of only 4 votes. The responsibility of the French socialists is thus total. Thanks nonetheless to those who did not follow governmental orders. The Moraes resolution remains a good text overall.

An apparently minor event may highlight the full range of an historical disaster. The European Parliament will vote tomorrow on the Draft resolution of Claude Moraes on surveillance. Claude Moraes was rapporteur of the European Parliament work on the Snowden revelations. In his report adopted in 2014, he recommended to suspend the Safe Harbor agreement1 and to put in place a directive on the protection of whistleblowers. Neither the European Commission nor the European Council followed these recommandations. On the contrary, they worked in the opposition direction, for instance working on the protection of business secrets against whistleblowers. One had to wait for the European Court of Justice decision invalidating the Safe Harbor agreement to see some moves from these sides, and even then it might be only to put in place urgently a new Safe Harbor agreement, none better than the previous one. Meanwhile, various European States, in particular France, the UK and the Netherlands have adopted laws legalising mass surveillance practices and opening the door to yet more extreme abuses in this domain.

The draft resolution of Claude Moraes is a new and welcome act of resistance against this downward slide. It includes in particular this article :

3. Is concerned at some of the recent laws in some Member States that extend surveillance capabilities of intelligence bodies, including, in France, the new intelligence law adopted by the National Assembly on 24 June 2015, several provisions of which, according to the Commission, raise important legal questions, in the UK, the adoption of the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 and the subsequent court decision that certain articles were unlawful and to be disapplied, and, in the Netherlands, the proposals for new legislation to update the Intelligence and Security Act of 2002; reiterates its call on all Member States to ensure that their current and future legislative frameworks and oversight mechanisms governing the activities of intelligence agencies are in line with the standards of the European Convention on Human Rights and all relevant Union legislation; asks the Commission to launch without delay an assessment of all provisions of the French intelligence law and to determine its compliance with European primary and secondary law;

Will thus the social-democrats MEP find back a capability to oppose putting in place mass suspicion and surveillance mechanisms which, like other parties, they promote where they are in power. Assuming it would be counting without the capability of the French S&D MEPs to keep going deeper in their moral and political disaster. The French socialist MEPs have requested and obtained from the S&D group for the vote on article 3 to be split in 4 parts, highlighted above by the alternance of normal and boldface fonts. They thus hope to obtain the rejection of the criticism and the call for an enquiry on the legality of the French law on security services with respect to European law.

Fortunately, there will be a nomimal vote on each of the parts. We will be able to make accountable each MEP who accepts receiving orders to work against fundamental rights from his or her government. Every MEP can act with what is just the basic respect for fundamental rights by adopting article 3 as a whole and in particular the second and fourth parts.

  1. Agremment negotiated that allowed for US companies to transfer and process data of European citizens without compliance with either the letter or the principles of European data protection. []

How should we frame and serve cultural rights in the digital age ?

This post gives the core of what I said in the panel on « Legalizing file-sharing: an idea whose time has come – or gone? » in the Information Influx conference organized to celebrate the 25 years of IViR, the Institute of Information Law in Amsterdam on 4 July 2014. The panel brought together 4 […]

Political asylum in France for Edward Snowden now!

published at the occasion of the first anniversary of the Snowden revelations and a large-scale campaign in France demanding President Hollande to grant constitutional asylum to Edward Snowden.

Don’t harm the best effort Internet to compensate for the loss of roaming income

This post has undergone various limited revisions since its original publication. When not purely cosmetical, these revisions are signaled through footnotes. The European Parliament is presently in the last stages of first reading for a revision of the telecom regumation. This revision addresses two facets: roaming costs for international mobile communications and network neutrality. Cancelling […]

Will French Parliamentarians Consent to a Democratorship?

Numerous reactions are now being voiced against the inclusion in the 2014-2019 Defense Bill of article 13 whose provisions enable a pervasive surveillance of online data and communications. Gilles Babinet, appointed in 2012 as French Digital Champion to Nellie Kroes, Vice-President of the European Commission responsible for the Digital Agenda for Europe, was quoted [fr] […]

A senior beginner

Photo Jean Salvat Madeleine V. is my partner’s aunt. She just started using computers and the internet, a 95 years old beginner. Yesterday, we received her first email. She was motivated and assisted by the staff of Résidence Canarie, the old people’s home in Argelès-Gazost. I promised her a post on this blog is she […]

The maelström of Violet

See footnote for more on the context of this entry1. Five dancers at the back of the scene. Motionless, regularly spaced. On the left, a drums set, the usual instruments of electronic music, and an also immobile musician. It lasts, and tension builds. Then one of them, the taller one, starts to raise his arm […]

It’s just time

In Europe and elsewhere, societies are in a strange state. Even when not voicing it, many are indignant at social injustice, at the apathy in face of ecological challenges, at the ruling groups, their blind economicism and their colluded interests, at the development of pervasive control and surveillance. Meanwhile, citizens and societal groups develop new […]

Sharing is a cultural right, not a market failure

An endless stream of law proposals, soft-law initiatives and free-trade agreements keeps trying to eradicate or prevent the non-market sharing of digital works between individuals. New strategies are pushed using incentives and threats so that intermediaries will police the Internet to save the scarcity-based business models of a few from the competition of abundance. So […]

The body as architecture

I carry on my episodical chronicles of contemporay dance performances on this blog. My literary experimentation blog could be better suited, but it is in French only. The yearly Rencontres Choréographiques de la Seine-Saint-Denis are back, and with them the pleasure of discoveries for the intermittent amateur. Tamara Bacci, Marthe Krummenacher and Perrine Valli are […]

Discussion of the Onlife Manifesto

The Onlife Manifesto was produced by a multidisciplinary group for the European Commission DG Connect. Its focus is “what it means to be human in a hyperconnected world”. I was one of 7 people asked to react to it at the occasion of its publication on 8 February 2013 in Brussels. The others were representatives […]

Expropriation from the common heritage

Some context for English speaking readers: on 15 January 2013 the French National Library (BnF) has signed public-private partnerships for the digitizing of 70000 ancient books (up to 1700) and 200,000 78 and 33 rpm sound recordings of patrimonial value. These partnerships, respectively with ProQuest and Believe, grant a 10 years exclusive commercial exploitation right […]

We need a new formulation of end-to-end analysis

End-to-end analysis is the major theoretization of the Internet that was proposed by Jerome Saltzer, David Reed and David Clark from 1981. In their seminal paper and later ones, they formulated what became known as the end-to-end principle, interpreted often as “application-specific functions ought to reside in the end hosts of a network rather than […]

The Polish campaign for the right to culture

I write this post in a mix of sadness and joy. The sadness of losing Aaron Swartz who committed suicide two days ago. He was a great person (say all who met him) to whom we owe a significant part of the victory against SOPA in the US through his organization Demand Progress and many […]

Increased advertising pollution on is the hosting service associated to the WordPress free software blog platform (WP for short). I often described this combination as virtuous, as it permits users to open easily and swiftly a hosted blog, while letting them move it easily to a self-hosted or other host solution using the same software. The growth of […]