<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philippe Aigrain &#187; brevets / patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net</link>
	<description>Chroniques politiques, techniques et émotionnelles / Political, technical and emotional chronicles</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Two narrow votes</title>
		<link>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=145</link>
		<comments>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=145#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philippe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[biens communs / commons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brevets / patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ACTA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GMO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OGM]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OMPI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two important votes have been decided with the minimal margin yesterday. The first one was for the election of the new General Director of the World Intellectual Property Organization. The newly elected DG will chair the organization in complex times. WIPO must either reform itself to take in account the global demands of innovation, creation, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=145</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scrutinising the Microsoft WSPP Development Agreements</title>
		<link>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=107</link>
		<comments>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=107#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philippe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biens communs / commons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brevets / patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[logiciels libres / free software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disclaimer: Just my opinion, not the official opinion of the Software Freedom Law Center on whose board of directors I serve. Thanks to Anne-Catherine Lorrain for research on the reverse engineering and decompilation exceptions of the 1991 directive.
Microsoft has published its licenses for access to interoperability information in the field of file and printer servers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=107</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bitter victory?</title>
		<link>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=106</link>
		<comments>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=106#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philippe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biens communs / commons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brevets / patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please read the comments that follow this post. They provide important additional information and answer some of the questions in the post.
Microsoft has announced new conditions of access to the information necessary for interoperability with its software. The European Commission considers that these conditions fulfill its requirements.  The French economic newspaper Les échos reports [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=106</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric S. Maskin and software patents</title>
		<link>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=105</link>
		<comments>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=105#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philippe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[brevets / patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric S. Maskin has just been awarded the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, often called Nobel Prize in Economics. He shares the prize with Leonid Hurwicz and Roger B. Myerson. They are rewarded for having laid the foundations of mechanism design theory (also known as implementation theory), a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=105</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>La contagion du dumping fiscal: Commentaire du projet d&#8217;Hervé Gaymard de réduire l&#8217;imposition des revenus de brevets de 19 à 15 %</title>
		<link>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=27</link>
		<comments>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=27#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philippe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[brevets / patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politique française]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dans un entretien avec le journal Les Echos du 16 décembre 2004 (accès réservé aux abonnés), commenté par le Monde daté 17 décembre 2004 sous le titre Pour Hervé Gaymard, &#8220;trop d&#8217;impôt tue l&#8217;emploi&#8221; le ministre de l&#8217;économie et des finances annonce son intention de &#8220;ramener la taxation du produit des brevets de 19 % [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=27</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why software - in particular embedded software - should not be patented</title>
		<link>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=24</link>
		<comments>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=24#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 08:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philippe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[brevets / patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The promoters of software patents have often recourse to the case of embedded software to try to justify them.  Because physical machines that embed software have both physical and information components, they conclude that the principles of both should be equally patented. I have produced various analysis to demonstrate that it is not the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=24</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
